christine chau.
Wednesday, 6 November 2013
Monday, 4 November 2013
Capstone Proposal
THE ISSUE:
This capstone
project is aimed at decreasing the negative impacts of long term hospitalised
children for Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). The products are
designed to assist young primary school aged patients in their rehabilitation
and treatment of CKD. The goal is to help encourage understanding and growth of
these patients, reducing hospital time, and ensuring less of a negative impact
left on the child.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and renal failure (RF) have been recognised
as a significant medical problem for most of the last 2 centuries and, until
relatively recently, were uniformly fatal. Chronic kidney disease is
characterised by an irreversible deterioration of renal function that gradually
progresses to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Chronic kidney disease has
emerged as a serious public health problem.
SIGNIFICANCE:
(Data gathered from the Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) registry, Kidney
Health Australia, ItalKid and North American
Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study (NAPRTCS))
- The incidence of kidney failure is rising among adults and is commonly associated with poor outcomes and high cost.
- In the past 2 decades, the incidence of the chronic kidney disease in children has steadily increased, with poor and ethnic minority children disproportionately affected.
- Children constituted 5.3% of patients with chronic kidney disease seen in a referral hospital.
- Studies reported a mean incidence of 12.1 cases per year per million in the age-related population (age range, 8.8-13.9 y) and a prevalence of 74.7 per million in this population.
- However, underreporting due to lack of recognition may suggest an even higher prevalence in children.
- About 70% of children with chronic kidney disease develop ESRD by age 20 years. They have a 10-year survival rate of about 80% and an age-specific mortality rate of about 30 times that seen in children without ESRD.
- The risk of death was associated with the year in which renal replacement therapy was initiated, the age of patients at the start of that therapy, and the type of dialysis used.
BENEFITS:
Everyone who has kidney failure, adults and children alike, will
experience medical complications, which may include extreme fatigue, inability
to concentrate, weak bones, nerve damage, depression, and sleep problems.
Additional problems for children can include effects on their growth and
development.
The isolation people feel because of kidney failure is especially a
problem in children and adolescents because of the importance of making friends
and fitting in at this age. The products designed will hopefully aid in
ensuring that a child with kidney failure can become an active, well-adjusted
adult.
How does this project suit your
abilities or interests?
I first looked into
this project because as a child, I had a family friend who suffered from chronic kidney
disease (CKD), and it affected her in all aspects of her life. I didn’t
understand the implication or extent of it, I just recalled that her bedroom always
had devices which resembled a hospital. These machines were large and bulky,
and took up a considerable amount of room. Looking back, from a complete stranger’s
point of view, the equipment design made it fearful to touch or use, and it was
alienating to visitors.
Recalling
this now, I wanted to have a close look at CKD, and redesign the main devices
used throughout the treatment course. I
wanted to incorporate the treatment devices into everyday use, and encourage
those who have questions, to ask. I wanted to be able redesign medical devices
for regular household use, because to someone who suffers from CKD, these
treatments mean life or death.
I also
believe that the childhood years are of the utmost importance. The medical
products today for CKD are not geared towards being user-friendly in homes, and
definitely do not account for children. There needs to be a change in this,
because there has been a rise in the rate of diagnosis of CKD in children in
the last two decades.
What is your approach or method
to ensure that you deeply understand your problem topic and your user?
To ensure that I
really understand the problem at hand I will be completing the following measures:
- Primary research: Interviewing patients, and family and friends of patients. Hospital staff could provide in depth understanding as well.
- Secondary research: Reading scholarly articles, researching into existing designs and understanding the technology involved.
- Character profiles: Building character profiles of my user, and in this case, primary school children. This will help better understand who I’m designing for.
- Behavioural mapping: Understanding how my user behaves, documenting their activities during a certain time. E.g. treatment times during the week.
- Draw from the experience: Similarly to character profiles, but gathering how their experience has affected them, and designing to combat negativity, or to encourage a faster healing process.
- Scale modelling/experience prototyping: Working closely with my target market, and creating a product that encompasses what they need in their lives.
Sunday, 20 October 2013
Studio Week 11
The idea
behind SwiftGift is a convenient, no fuss way to donate to a good cause. There
are 6 main reasons why people don’t donate, and some of those reasons are Parochialism – where people need to
find a relatable cause, Diffusion of Responsibility – where they assume others will donate and Money - where directly
asking for money makes people less willing to give. So targeting these 3 points
in particular, SwiftGift aims to steer people into a fuss-free, gratitude
inducing donation scheme. Research shows that when people feel good about
giving, they’re likely to donate more often, and thus more.
Consumers
don’t want to be deterred from their daily errands in order to just make a
donation, so SwiftGift incorporates its donation scheme into the lives of these
consumers seamlessly. It targets those who want to give to a good cause, and
supports petrol stations which are aiming to do the same thing. The idea behind
SwiftGift is to educate consumers while they are standing idle waiting for the
tank to fill, and thus give them the choice of helping those in need. As they
fill up, there is an automatic 1c p/L added to their bill, and on the side of
the screen there is a metre showing them just how their donation will help
those less fortunate than them. This idea basically works off the fact that
they have control of the trigger, so the donation is up to them.
Of course it
is not compulsory to give, so there is an option to decline from making a
donation. However, this is option is placed after the consumer has been
educated on how their donation helps, so instead there is a larger incentive to
help.
Peer Comments:
- Dominic See - http://dominicsee.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/project-2-pss-collaborative-consumption.html?showComment=1382310678970#c2853954135901266326
- Christina Le - http://christinaale.wordpress.com/2013/10/20/pss-collaborative-consumption/#comment-69
- Rowena Goodall - http://rowenagoodall.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/blog-post.html?showComment=1382856638256#c145726094459557667
- Matthew Patane - http://mpatanestudio3b.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/final-presentation.html?showComment=1382856856387#c9119791491911998835
- Christine Liang - http://mad-attic.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/fabric-pots.html?showComment=1382857046305#c649665151882252420
Tuesday, 8 October 2013
Studio Week 10
Today i presented this powerpoint to Tom.
Tom gave me some really good feedback, and drew my attention to my system map in particular. He said that it had to be more focused on how it affected the user, and the steps they took to complete the task. With that in mind, i'm going to redraw the entire thing. He also gave me a lot to think about in terms of the service i was providing. I had to make it seem more realistic and achievable.
Monday, 9 September 2013
Studio Week 7
Today was the first consultation with our new tutors for Project 2. My tutor was Tom, and i presented him with 3 ideas to do with my chosen brief for the RSA Student Awards: Innovation in giving or
fundraising: how can we encourage people to be more generous with their time and money for good causes.
fundraising: how can we encourage people to be more generous with their time and money for good causes.
Feedback From Tutor:
Tom particularly liked the first two concepts, and said that out of the 3 they were the ones with the most "innovation", and i agreed. For my first concept, he suggested i look at ways i could activate sensors from the car: e.g. flashing of lights or beeping of horns. We talked over a couple ideas, but i realised i had to do some research to see if the technology would be advanced enough to do what i needed it to. Tom suggested that for my second concept, instead of putting it in a public place such as shopping centres, i should consider implementing this into places such as the airport. But he liked the consideration that the money could go towards different charities, and donation boxes would be placed in multiple areas along the escalator.
Feedback From Peers:
I talked to Christina Le about my designs, and she liked the concepts, however was worried if maybe working the etag with one hand might be dangerous whilst driving. I also talked to Max Glanville about my designs, and he took a particular liking to my first one. He said i should include a 'fun' factor into donating, by possible uses of a billboard.
Other Tutor Session:
I listened in on Mar speaking with some of his students, and he suggested that a lot the ideas had been done previously. He said that we needed to think of more innovative ways to conduct our project, and suggested we get inspiration from what has already been done, and what needs to be done.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)